And so we come to the end of year number two for Sword STEM. I’m now the definitive word on sword kinematics, according to Google!
The story of 2019:
- A new and improved logo! Thank you very much Jeremy Petersen for your contribution.
- The updating schedule shifted from once a week to once every other week. (That’s bad.)
- We had the first article written not by me! Project Smart Sword by Kristen Argyle (That’s good.)
- We also had no other articles written by any other contributors (That’s bad.)
- Articles started to become popular and shared just from posting on the SwordSTEM Facebook page, instead of withering in obscurity until they were posted on the HEMA Alliance page. (That’s good.)
Also on a positive note, people at HEMA events have started introducing themselves with “I like your articles” instead of “I like your YouTube videos”. Which is great! Talking about nerdy HEMA science articles gets me way more excited than talking about YouTube. 😀
Thanks to Karen Black for all the help in editing, and making sure the end product is coherent for your reading pleasure. And thank you to everyone who has submitted article ideas or asked me questions that lead to new and interesting topics.
Best Performers
1st Place: Totally Scientific Reasons You Need a New Sword
4,091 views I had written this article (the one you are reading right now) at the start of December, thinking the stats wouldn’t change much by the end of the year. The only other article I had left to publish was a quick humor piece that I whimsically decided to write based on a few reader comments. It would probably only be seen by a few of my more loyal readers for a chuckle, and… Over 3,000 views? What is going on here? Where did this get shared? So many questions. Plus now I have to re-do my end of year article ranking! |
|
2n Place: Historical Injury vs Modern Tournament Targeting
3,941 views I’d been meaning to do this for a while, as I had a feeling that it would be quite popular. And, boy, it did not disappoint. Overall this article doesn’t offer much outside of curiosity; the context of the data is just too different. But it seems to really have captured the interest of the community. |
|
3rd Place: Slow is slow and fast is fast. And don’t let anyone tell you otherwise
1,311 views When I write something that I know people will take issue with, I know that it’s going to be popular. It was particularly humorous to watch alternating posts from people claiming “no one says that you should always go slow” and people contributing “I have talked to people who say that”. Also: If you do indeed believe that no one advocates the position I was criticizing, that doesn’t make it a strawman. A strawman is an attempt to change someone’s opinion from viewpoint A to viewpoint B, by constructing a viewpoint C which is clearly inferior to B. The defining feature is that you are using it as misdirection to lure people over from a viewpoint you avoid addressing directly. 😉 |
|
4th Place: How Did The Sources Say We Should Weight Targets?
1,281 views Fun story, on a cross continental flight I decided to add up the number of target mentions in a couple of HEMA sources to kill some time. A year later I found the notes and decided to make it an article; it is hard enough to make sure I always have content to keep up with the release schedule. And then it ends up |
|
4th Place: Myth of Knees Over Toes
1,281 views Evidently talking about physiological topics is proving to be quite popular. I don’t want SwordSTEM to be Sean’s coaching blog, but due to high interest I have some more interesting sport science research topics queued up for the new year. (This one also broke into the top after I had written the article. I had originally intended to only do top 4.) |
|
6th Place: There is no horizontal zwerchau cutting plane!
1,041 views Much like the “Slow is Slow” article, people really like to draw attention to how they missed the point. Mostly everyone agreed with the article; furthermore some people expressed shock that anyone would even have considered doing the “umbrella zwerch” at all! Which is another way of saying that they need to go back and read it more carefully. Because the umbrella zerch, as I described it, is the most common way that just about everyone does it! |
Honorable Mention: How Fast Do Swords Move? – Try 1.
Thanks Google, for giving me over 900 views on an article from last year!
Biggest Flops
Force, Deceleration, and how to stab through a tank.
316 views It had a sword stabbing through a tank! What more do you want from me? |
|
What German Weapons are most common?
219 views Previous articles consolidating stats from historical sources proved to be very popular. This one did not. |
|
Does HEMA have “Home Field Advantage?”
582 views While the page views alone didn’t make this a flop, I was kind of hoping that some people might get upset at this and make the whole thing blow up. Next time I need to draw more inflammatory conclusions and single countries out. |
My Favorites
Geometry of a Flat Hit
After a lengthy discussion surrounding the exchange in question, and posting of multiple screen captures, there were still individuals who insisted that the hit landed on edge. Which I found mind-boggling. There are some things which are subjective, but I think something like the angle of a sword should be fairly objective to prove. And so I set out to see if I could. You can view this as a contribution to the judge training of the HEMA world, or just a vanity project because I can’t handle not getting in the last word. Take your pick. |
|
Does HEMA have “Home Field Advantage?”
This was a great chance for me to build on results from previous articles, and actually look at something that would be completely impossible to figure out by intuition alone. |
Views by County Breakdown
It shouldn’t surprise you that Google’s analytics let you make cool pictures like this. Unfortunately traffic from the USA was so much higher than everywhere else that the graphic doesn’t really convey any other information than that one fact.
Go Canada! Coming in a strong number 2, looks like my homeland hasn’t forgotten about me.The other interesting number on this list is Japan. Given that HEMA isn’t exactly huge in Japan that likely means my articles have generated some interest amongst JSA practitioners. That, or I’m just disproportionately popular amongst the Japanese HEMA community.
Favorite Pictures
Another strong year up of upping my Photoshop PowerPoint image editing game.
That’s all folks!
Have a great holiday season. Here are the results in (mostly) their entirety.
Page | Pageviews | Unique Pageviews | Avg. Time on Page | Entrances | Bounce Rate | % Exit |
/2019/10/02/historical-injury-vs-modern-tournament-targeting/ | 3941 | 3691 | 238.22 | 3566 | 92.38% | 90.21% |
/ | 3545 | 2860 | 64.52 | 2243 | 71.20% | 53.03% |
/2019/12/11/totally-scientific-reasons-you-need-a-new-sword/?fbclid=IwAR2vFij6EUZFeDuu00rw3Oor-5RI_6njBm480NdqvIiFY1K2YD09rG32tDo | 2675 | 2586 | 219.33 | 2584 | 96.25% | 96.07% |
/2019/12/11/totally-scientific-reasons-you-need-a-new-sword/ | 1416 | 1356 | 232.27 | 1327 | 95.18% | 94.00% |
/2019/10/16/slow-is-slow-and-fast-is-fast-and-dont-let-anyone-tell-you-otherwise/ | 1311 | 1207 | 296.27 | 1100 | 88.82% | 84.74% |
/2019/03/20/how-did-the-sources-say-we-should-weight-targets/ | 1281 | 1208 | 242.48 | 1020 | 90.49% | 82.98% |
/2019/11/13/myth-of-knees-over-toes/ | 1136 | 1060 | 289.26 | 975 | 91.79% | 87.41% |
/2019/07/10/there-is-no-horizontal-zwerchau-cutting-plane/ | 1041 | 976 | 276.19 | 873 | 90.26% | 83.19% |
/2018/08/22/how-fast-do-swords-move-try-1/ | 932 | 841 | 305.97 | 794 | 86.40% | 83.91% |
/2019/01/09/accelerating-the-wrist-in-a-cut-it-doesnt-work/ | 701 | 648 | 266.21 | 457 | 81.62% | 68.76% |
/2019/04/17/is-going-for-deep-targets-worth-it-and-more-longpoint-stats-review/ | 657 | 596 | 254.99 | 421 | 87.17% | 71.99% |
/2019/10/30/do-swords-really-wear-out/ | 615 | 588 | 259.37 | 441 | 91.84% | 79.51% |
/2019/01/23/does-hema-have-home-field-advantage/ | 582 | 555 | 206.31 | 482 | 89.65% | 82.47% |
/page/2/ | 520 | 379 | 42.76 | 34 | 61.76% | 9.04% |
/2019/08/21/project-smart-sword/ | 501 | 472 | 205.35 | 364 | 89.84% | 76.05% |
/2019/09/18/its-not-all-in-the-hips/ | 478 | 441 | 234.74 | 280 | 87.86% | 65.90% |
/2019/08/07/geometry-of-a-flat-hit/ | 437 | 414 | 234.73 | 308 | 92.53% | 78.26% |
/2018/04/19/center-of-percussion-vibration-node-balance-point-what-does-it-all-mean/ | 422 | 399 | 376.86 | 338 | 89.94% | 81.99% |
/2018/05/23/physics-push-pull-with-the-longsword-bad-cuts-and-you/ | 410 | 376 | 207.97 | 251 | 72.11% | 61.95% |
/2019/05/01/why-do-polearms-hurt/ | 380 | 346 | 226.56 | 245 | 82.45% | 63.42% |
/2019/02/20/loss-aversion-counting-up-vs-down/ | 374 | 348 | 276.88 | 265 | 86.79% | 75.13% |
/2019/02/06/accelerating-the-wrist-2-revenge-of-the-moulinet-and-more/ | 365 | 336 | 221.58 | 208 | 88.46% | 64.66% |
/page/3/ | 365 | 291 | 45.87 | 43 | 83.72% | 16.16% |
/2019/06/12/force-deceleration-and-how-to-stab-through-a-tank/ | 316 | 298 | 284.77 | 162 | 88.89% | 62.03% |
/2019/07/24/tournament-season-tournament-countries-where-and-when-does-hema-happen/ | 295 | 285 | 174.75 | 220 | 89.55% | 78.64% |
/page/4/ | 288 | 224 | 47.24 | 30 | 76.67% | 13.19% |
/2018/09/05/what-does-hitting-hard-mean/ | 263 | 246 | 240.55 | 180 | 88.89% | 75.67% |
/page/5/ | 238 | 186 | 35.46 | 18 | 55.56% | 13.45% |
/2019/06/26/batting-a-cut-out-of-the-way-a-k-a-how-you-cut-your-hand-open/ | 232 | 219 | 195.63 | 56 | 80.36% | 40.95% |
/2019/03/06/rust-know-your-enemy/ | 230 | 220 | 186.73 | 146 | 89.73% | 72.17% |
/2018/08/15/hema-ratings-does-it-actually-mean-anything/ | 224 | 205 | 184.65 | 155 | 77.42% | 74.55% |
/2019/05/29/what-german-weapons-are-most-common/ | 219 | 203 | 118.65 | 94 | 77.89% | 48.86% |
/2019/01/02/fny-rules-are-not-about-single-exchanges/ | 213 | 202 | 274.61 | 146 | 87.07% | 73.24% |
/2019/09/04/dont-give-points-when-people-withdraw-from-matches/ | 205 | 192 | 145.32 | 68 | 85.29% | 48.29% |
/author/sean-franklin/ | 202 | 163 | 46.83 | 83 | 46.99% | 30.20% |
/2019/04/03/building-the-longpoint-back-end/ | 197 | 186 | 203.19 | 125 | 89.60% | 71.07% |
/2019/05/15/what-can-go-wrong-with-hema-ratings/ | 187 | 178 | 272.34 | 95 | 81.05% | 60.96% |
/sample-page/ | 179 | 149 | 38.00 | 28 | 46.43% | 27.37% |
/2018/06/27/what-is-force-dispersion-and-how-it-keeps-you-safe-from-swords/ | 161 | 148 | 192.11 | 96 | 81.25% | 64.60% |
/2019/11/27/full-afterblow-smackdown-12-vs-23/ | 155 | 146 | 170.69 | 111 | 90.09% | 77.42% |
/links-resources/ | 147 | 123 | 59.98 | 42 | 71.43% | 40.14% |
/2018/06/20/impact-impulse-and-momentum/ | 146 | 127 | 215.42 | 81 | 76.54% | 59.59% |
/page/6/ | 141 | 107 | 20.53 | 14 | 50.00% | 17.73% |
/2019/04/17/is-going-for-deep-targets-worth-it-and-more-longpoint-stats-review/?fbclid=IwAR1yNTWTwZQ0uGrMp46PJMg1zcwSdEIXo-VBhu9mjhANXOYrDiYLewlko-w | 136 | 136 | 0.00 | 136 | 100.00% | 100.00% |
/2019/12/11/totally-scientific-reasons-you-need-a-new-sword/?fbclid=IwAR2oB1IdWOEJlhA31gfJz_gQCliH0y9YRH_dYI7WHYhZzLqCqVcdpZdqrHg | 131 | 125 | 203.11 | 125 | 94.40% | 93.13% |
/2018/06/06/the-myth-of-control/ | 130 | 123 | 197.10 | 47 | 61.70% | 43.85% |
/2018/09/26/control-theory/ | 128 | 122 | 216.00 | 78 | 83.33% | 66.41% |
/2018/11/21/586/ | 125 | 118 | 270.07 | 62 | 83.87% | 56.80% |
/2018/04/20/how-much-does-initial-point-value-discourage-safe-attacks/ | 121 | 113 | 102.04 | 9 | 44.44% | 26.45% |
/2018/10/17/what-makes-a-sword-stiff/ | 120 | 113 | 263.11 | 52 | 86.54% | 54.17% |
/category/physics/ | 119 | 105 | 40.36 | 80 | 97.50% | 67.23% |
/2019/12/11/totally-scientific-reasons-you-need-a-new-sword/?fbclid=IwAR2pCP0L4_YQjvOFBjBD6oMNhBqEkIKt4iNAtZcAG9ofY1Gp429OWoh3vjE | 102 | 98 | 555.60 | 98 | 94.90% | 95.10% |
/2018/11/14/steel-why/ | 101 | 96 | 233.82 | 42 | 76.19% | 51.49% |
/2018/12/05/thibault-vs-modern-anthropometry/ | 96 | 92 | 243.93 | 36 | 86.11% | 42.71% |
/2018/10/04/geometry-grab-bag/ | 94 | 87 | 250.21 | 64 | 84.38% | 70.21% |
/2018/10/24/concussion-not-a-normal-injury/ | 89 | 85 | 286.83 | 43 | 79.07% | 53.93% |
/2018/12/19/why-does-my-gear-crack-in-half/ | 86 | 82 | 298.20 | 20 | 70.00% | 47.67% |
/2019/11/13/myth-of-knees-over-toes/?fbclid=IwAR3f8kU7rr0yJrVwOziwmZ1LWlfvSQTL6-O_l5o6t4PD8DBwNprmMXL-4qI | 86 | 83 | 1223.67 | 83 | 96.39% | 96.51% |
/2018/04/26/force-vs-pressure/ | 85 | 84 | 242.24 | 35 | 91.43% | 56.47% |
/2018/09/05/what-does-hitting-hard-mean/?fbclid=IwAR3FIdhjzejhv9-iRNM1-ZcnI1gVWKXHCLK_ig74mToB_KbPOB5CSV_oCi8 | 85 | 81 | 117.80 | 81 | 92.59% | 94.12% |
/contact/ | 84 | 62 | 93.66 | 10 | 70.00% | 29.76% |
/2018/11/07/do-they-double-a-lot-in-the-swordfish-finals/ | 78 | 73 | 269.43 | 22 | 72.73% | 34.62% |
/category/physics/page/3/ | 77 | 73 | 328.57 | 64 | 93.75% | 81.82% |
/2018/08/08/introduction-to-material-properties/ | 76 | 70 | 142.89 | 51 | 72.55% | 63.16% |
/2018/12/12/are-double-hits-and-afterblows-related/ | 76 | 68 | 142.47 | 10 | 60.00% | 27.63% |
/2018/05/10/rotational-spinny-translational-straight-ey-motion-swords/ | 75 | 68 | 171.35 | 17 | 76.47% | 42.67% |
/2018/07/11/for-the-paranoid-and-the-pansies-what-is-real-risk/ | 73 | 71 | 137.81 | 31 | 77.42% | 41.10% |
/2018/09/19/sword-cutting-and-how-the-target-pushes-back/ | 71 | 70 | 167.57 | 42 | 80.95% | 60.56% |
/2018/07/31/data-mining-socal-swordfight-longsword/ | 61 | 57 | 57.94 | 8 | 75.00% | 42.62% |
/2018/07/18/case-study-socal-2018-sword-and-buckler/ | 59 | 57 | 296.35 | 37 | 86.49% | 71.19% |
/2018/12/26/swordstem-presents-stats-about-swordstem/ | 59 | 52 | 116.35 | 21 | 76.19% | 42.37% |
/2019/10/02/historical-injury-vs-modern-tournament-targeting/?fbclid=IwAR2ps7PA89VG-rW0Dwy0TmYt6U2YPizrG51zLdoEwa3gXw0cc1Z-9s2qCMc | 58 | 55 | 398.25 | 55 | 94.55% | 93.10% |
/2018/05/30/hanging-targets-is-cheating/ | 57 | 54 | 112.23 | 16 | 50.00% | 24.56% |
/2018/10/10/tatami-ballistics/ | 55 | 54 | 146.07 | 24 | 87.50% | 45.45% |
/category/gear/ | 52 | 38 | 26.26 | 6 | 50.00% | 19.23% |
/contribute/ | 52 | 45 | 60.39 | 8 | 75.00% | 30.77% |
/page/4/?fbclid=IwAR10hXNnJCWCrLefVVf9hCPhwEN6TkqU6qEKePfNk3Uh1brlZsUwpxJ-g4k | 52 | 51 | 11.53 | 36 | 0.00% | 26.92% |
/category/physics/cutting/ | 51 | 35 | 47.19 | 7 | 42.86% | 15.69% |
/page/7/ | 50 | 46 | 54.28 | 0 | 0.00% | 20.00% |
/2018/10/31/survive-the-pools-and-fence-the-finals/ | 49 | 46 | 198.84 | 5 | 40.00% | 22.45% |
/category/rule-sets/afterblow/ | 48 | 41 | 54.91 | 17 | 76.47% | 33.33% |
/login/?redirect_to=https://swordstem.com/wp-admin/ | 47 | 46 | 19.50 | 30 | 100.00% | 95.74% |
/2018/05/17/non-zero-sum-concepts-in-tournament-rulesets/ | 44 | 41 | 344.95 | 13 | 76.92% | 50.00% |
/2019/10/16/slow-is-slow-and-fast-is-fast-and-dont-let-anyone-tell-you-otherwise/?fbclid=IwAR2b8WGeOVO432kyzU0Ywsn9lEvtJQRamJaszOSm93-X5CUb4BQPRQnDvfY | 43 | 40 | 495.00 | 40 | 92.50% | 90.70% |
/2019/02/ | 42 | 28 | 221.76 | 20 | 80.00% | 50.00% |
/category/rule-sets/cleanliness/ | 40 | 35 | 65.60 | 9 | 22.22% | 12.50% |
/2018/06/13/is-it-important-to-weigh-target-values/ | 39 | 36 | 127.85 | 8 | 62.50% | 33.33% |
/2018/05/01/how-much-does-participant-skill-affect-overall-behavior/ | 37 | 37 | 112.40 | 1 | 100.00% | 18.92% |
/2019/10/02/historical-injury-vs-modern-tournament-targeting/?fbclid=IwAR3p_VAxSNP5wDeUGVkfTBFI9Gyj_ERPdNXkiVeDnjMSnMctqcUiWMn6PSQ | 37 | 34 | 434.67 | 34 | 91.18% | 91.89% |
/2018/07/04/scalability-why-bugs-are-small-and-tournament-rulesets-are-hard/ | 35 | 32 | 100.95 | 13 | 69.23% | 45.71% |
/2019/10/02/historical-injury-vs-modern-tournament-targeting/?fbclid=IwAR31WKSNEPsUlnitdX_gkaBnRVxCiZtNrlFPHJWQb1YPgw_KLXcufZhJzNA | 34 | 31 | 133.25 | 31 | 87.10% | 88.24% |
/2019/10/16/slow-is-slow-and-fast-is-fast-and-dont-let-anyone-tell-you-otherwise/?fbclid=IwAR12TrIRIlIdQtFO-TeOqhWrfhSdvz0Zu7D09WRngKPso7KD2LPn0RJhmY4 | 34 | 34 | 0.00 | 34 | 100.00% | 100.00% |
/2018/08/29/does-bracket-seeding-mean-anything/ | 32 | 32 | 208.75 | 27 | 96.30% | 87.50% |
/2018/09/12/case-study-socal-2018-singlestick/ | 31 | 30 | 172.77 | 14 | 85.71% | 58.06% |
/2019/10/02/historical-injury-vs-modern-tournament-targeting/?fbclid=IwAR3dBavCgMMp8r5AUwuhaKg_CoL8qs-6z077VTAuDDN43nS8YCVXkPQOkUU | 31 | 20 | 108.17 | 20 | 85.00% | 61.29% |
/404.html?page=/2019/09/11/its-not-all-in-the-hips/&from=http://m.facebook.com/ | 31 | 20 | 14.00 | 19 | 42.11% | 54.84% |
/2018/07/25/force-vector-more-than-a-science-ey-sounding-name/ | 30 | 27 | 132.65 | 10 | 80.00% | 43.33% |
/2019/01/09/accelerating-the-wrist-in-a-cut-it-doesnt-work/?fbclid=IwAR1hu-66knwCFLnq_eqWdokV9SHrOaI3cfM2jKfr_XrsMpurz54l-5mIvcc | 30 | 28 | 158.00 | 28 | 92.86% | 93.33% |
/author/sean-franklin/page/2/ | 29 | 23 | 47.48 | 3 | 66.67% | 6.90% |
/2019/08/07/geometry-of-a-flat-hit/?fbclid=IwAR2tiKg8WgeVQaWSE7V16a0ZCo9OvcSXpndg6rSTeN2Sati-fJFPOApsM-8 | 28 | 25 | 653.25 | 25 | 88.00% | 85.71% |